Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:00:46 +0900 From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> To: Mark_Andrews@isc.org Cc: Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella <jrh@it.uc3m.es>, Lista <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>, "(Lista) bind9-users@isc.org" <bind9-users@isc.org> Subject: Re: RES_INSECURE and CHECK_SRVR_ADDR in resolver functions (IPv6 anycast response problem) Message-ID: <y7vy99xgsqp.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> In-Reply-To: <200209192259.g8JMxsB5065119@drugs.dv.isc.org> References: <3D898E6B.692C3C43@it.uc3m.es> <200209192259.g8JMxsB5065119@drugs.dv.isc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 08:59:54 +1000, >>>>> Mark_Andrews@isc.org said: > IPv6 anycast addresses are a joke as they are currently > defined. Don't bother with them until there behaviour > gets redefined by the IETF. (I'm just asking,) what is the "joke" part of the current definition? The restriction that an anycast address must not be used as a packet's source address? JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?y7vy99xgsqp.wl>