Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 11:59:38 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Atipa <freebsd@atipa.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOTICE: Softupdates Message-ID: <19980518115938.07526@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980517203817.1796A-100000@altrox.atipa.com>; from Atipa on Sun, May 17, 1998 at 08:41:26PM -0600 References: <199805180301.UAA00444@rah.star-gate.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980517203817.1796A-100000@altrox.atipa.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 17, 1998 at 08:41:26PM -0600, Atipa wrote: > > Has this been worth the effort? :) > > In other words, how much faster is it than standard mounts, and how much > faster is it than "async,noatime" mounts? > > Although in practice it is still a bit shakey, is it theoretically more > stable (in life and in unexpected death...) than async mounts? It is theoretically as stable as normal mounts, in life and in death. This is much much more stable than async. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980518115938.07526>