Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Dec 2001 20:45:26 +0200
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>
Cc:        Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.pp.ru>, "Crist J . Clark" <cjc@FreeBSD.ORG>, net@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NOARP - gateway must answer and have frozen ARP table
Message-ID:  <20011205204526.B89520@sunbay.com>
In-Reply-To: <200112051835.fB5IZqH95521@whizzo.transsys.com>
References:  <20011205124430.A83642@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20011205040316.H40864@blossom.cjclark.org> <20011205231735.A1361@grosbein.pp.ru> <20011205193859.B79705@sunbay.com> <200112051835.fB5IZqH95521@whizzo.transsys.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:35:52PM -0500, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
> Doesn't this behavior need to be on a per-interface basis?  I'm wondering
> if a single sysctl is sufficient to get the desired effect.
> 
No, we want ARP table to stay intact no matter which interface
sends us an update.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov		Oracle Developer/DBA,
ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software AG,
ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251	Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011205204526.B89520>