Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Dec 1998 09:55:46 -0800 (PST)
From:      Annelise Anderson <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu>
To:        Josh Gilliam <josh@quick.net>
Cc:        Wolfram Schneider <wosch@panke.de.freebsd.org>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: spelling question
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.981231095237.27683A-100000@andrsn.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <19981228204147.A8433@newport-1-5.quick.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 28 Dec 1998, Josh Gilliam wrote:

> > > Sorry to spam this list, but I'm hoping some on this list are
> > > particularly strong in spelling.  Is ``corelation'' really an accepted
> > > spelling?  It in my Random House dictionary, WWWebster Dictionary
> > > (http://www.m-w.com/netdict.htm), nor Solaris's dict/words.  If not, I
> > > want to remove these spellings from our dict/words.

According to my Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, "corelation" is
primarily British.  I would not include it in a U.S.-English
spell-checking dictionary.

Annelise




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.981231095237.27683A-100000>