Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:23:30 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] amd64 suspend/resume code to be comitted Message-ID: <200903251823.40899.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3a142e750903251422x3c19207by5c817bfa9d872b85@mail.gmail.com> References: <200903111233.14029.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <3a142e750903251422x3c19207by5c817bfa9d872b85@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 05:22 pm, Paul B. Mahol wrote: > On 3/11/09, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> wrote: > > With popular demands, I will commit the following patch in next > > few days unless a showstopper is found or "over-my-dead-body" > > type of review is received. ;-) > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/amd64_suspend-20090311.diff > > > > FYI, it was originally posted here: > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810211228.31028.jkim > > > > and here: > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812102120.03788.jkim > > > > Please read the original threads for more information about the > > patch. > > Looks some of your changes makes i386 without ACPI (acpi is > disabled; not loaded and hint.acpi.0.disabled=1) fail to reboot. > > It this already known/documented behavior? Huh? No, it is totally unexpected because I didn't touch non-ACPI path for i386. Can you back out r189903, r190339, r190340 and test again? Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200903251823.40899.jkim>