Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:49:19 +0400
From:      "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules
Message-ID:  <20010823134919.B5992@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <xzpg0ajqfs1.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
References:  <200108230913.f7N9Dk525008@freefall.freebsd.org> <xzpg0ajqfs1.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:36:30 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> >   Log:
> >   Remove non-existen kernfs
> 
> Why do you do that?  It's not "non-existent", it's just been removed
> from -CURRENT.  I believe we have a stated policy of not removing
> CVSROOT/modules entries for code that still exists on older branches.

I doubt we can keep 'modules' useful for non-current too, just consider
movings like many things from sys/miscfs to sys/fs. Current module names
in that case are unusable for non-current. Or do you mean it must be
semi-usable excepting movings?

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010823134919.B5992>