Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:12:11 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Documenting locking requirements in section 9 manual pages Message-ID: <20050112171211.GA1673@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> In-Reply-To: <20050112121410.GA6704@eddie.nitro.dk> References: <84dead720501111830323a37b1@mail.gmail.com> <20050112112923.GB81953@ip.net.ua> <20050112121410.GA6704@eddie.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2005-01-12 13:14, "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@freebsd.org> wrote: >On 2005.01.12 13:29:23 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >>On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:30:19AM +0000, Joseph Koshy wrote: >>> Do we have a standard place in our section 9 manual page format >>> to describe locking requirements of kernel interfaces? >>> >>> What do folks think of a ".Sh LOCKING" section like >>> the existing ".Sh RETURN VALUES"? >> >> I think this is important enough to be worth a separate section. >> Fine with me. Make sure to update share/examples/mdoc/example.9 >> if you go this way. > > Actually we don't have a section 9 example, only 1, 3, and 4. I guess > it should be fairly simple for somebody to make an example.9 based on > one of the other pages. Shamelessly copied from example.3, how does the following look? http://people.freebsd.org/~keramida/example.9 - Giorgos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050112171211.GA1673>