Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:21:54 -0800 From: Doug Barton <DougB@dougbarton.net> To: Sergei Kolobov <sergei@kolobov.com> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED Message-ID: <3FE10F42.7030208@dougbarton.net> In-Reply-To: <20031217060754.GA714@chetwood.ru> References: <200312162127.hBGLRMUF039206@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031217022824.GA26180@xor.obsecurity.org> <20031217060754.GA714@chetwood.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sergei Kolobov wrote: > I have mixed feelings about this myself, however: > - the software refers to itself as "MailScanner", in Perl module name, > all paths and filenames We have some other perl stuff that defies the case sensitive convention, but I don't like that either. :) Also, is this thing a perl module? If so, then there should be a p5- prepended to the port name. THAT convention is well enough engrained to be outside dispute. > - I suggested to the maintainer that PORTNAME should be changed to > MailScanner, in order to make the paths and names consistent with the > software's own naming scheme I think that your advice here was bad. All due respect. The value of having a consistent name space in the ports tree far exceeds the value of consistency with the path names of the installed software. FWIW, Doug
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FE10F42.7030208>