Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:35:24 -0800 From: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> To: "Hiten Pandya" <hiten@unixdaemons.com>, "Darren Reed" <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> Cc: "Hiten Pandya" <hiten@unixdaemons.com>, <current@FreeBSD.ORG>, <darrenr@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: PFIL_HOOKS should be made default in 5.0 Message-ID: <0e5401c2a7e1$37149090$52557f42@errno.com> References: <0a6201c2a6f9$42cfd720$52557f42@errno.com> <200212200127.MAA20942@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au> <20021220032930.GA67469@unixdaemons.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Maybe we should put in the release notes, that:
>
> "PFIL_HOOKS is required for IPFILTER"
The right thing is to force the dependency in the code (I don't think
there's a way to express it to config). The ipfilter code should probably
have something like
#ifndef PFIL_HOOKS
#error "You must specify PFIL_HOOKS when using ipfilter"
#endif
Unfortunately there's no way that I know to express this if ipfilter is
loaded as a module.
Sam
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0e5401c2a7e1$37149090$52557f42>