Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 20:45:56 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SUJ update Message-ID: <20100504004556.GA59830@sandvine.com> In-Reply-To: <4BDF5D15.5040207@FreeBSD.org> References: <4BDCE05A.5020307@FreeBSD.org> <20100502.073857.74726756.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20100503140438.262539xlm87yp0ao@webmail.leidinger.net> <20100503.151903.74740368.sthaug@nethelp.no> <4BDF5D15.5040207@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 04:32:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > I also don't want to bikeshed this to death. I imagine that once the > feature is stable that users will just twiddle it once and then leave it > alone, or it will be set at install time and then not twiddled at all. :) Speaking of which, is there any reason for us not to support enabling SU+J at newfs time? (Other than just needing a clean way to share the code between tunefs and newfs.) -Ed
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100504004556.GA59830>