Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:54:35 -0600 (MDT) From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: xcllnt@mac.com Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, marcel@FreeBSD.org, bms@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r184194 - in head/sys: conf mips/conf Message-ID: <20081024.215435.74734191.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <DEF7B780-95E7-42CC-B55C-FEAD3F0D52CC@mac.com> References: <B0A1F783-D8B2-45AE-9583-3FA5189BE164@mac.com> <20081024.165035.41635952.imp@bsdimp.com> <DEF7B780-95E7-42CC-B55C-FEAD3F0D52CC@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r184194 - in head/sys: conf mips/conf Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:04:44 -0700 > On Oct 24, 2008, at 3:50 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > > >> Please provide other grounds for reversal. > > > > (1) You didn't ask us first. > > This is no grounds for reversal. It is weak.. > > (2) Others have said this is a bad idea. > > People were confused about the change. Some people were confused, but others knew exactly what you did and still didn't like it. > > (3) There's appears to be a conensus that we should move the other way > > from what you are doing. > > Ok, this I buy. If people agree, we can discuss the > scope and impact of the new route. If it's not too > big a job I'll do the back-out by implementing it or > otherwise I'll just back out this change and forget > about it. Does that sound like a plan? Sounds good. Let's figure out where we want to go, and live with this in the interim. If we can't agree by, say, the end of MeetBSD, then backing out sounds like a plan. Would you like for me to write up what I had in mind as a starting point since I objected to this solution? Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081024.215435.74734191.imp>