Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:30:45 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Taku YAMAMOTO <taku@cent.saitama-u.ac.jp> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] for SCHED_ULE & libpthread issue (was Re: I like SCHED_4BSD) Message-ID: <20040318023045.GE3018@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040312092348.18be60e0.taku@cent.saitama-u.ac.jp> References: <XFMail.20040310213645.conrads@cox.net> <4050BBCB.50302@cinci.rr.com> <20040312092348.18be60e0.taku@cent.saitama-u.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:23:47AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
> Until the problem is fully addressed, I will propose following patch
> to be applied. (the least intrusive one attached in the former message)
Do people think we should commit this?
> --- sched_ule.c.orig Fri Feb 13 05:24:48 2004
> +++ sched_ule.c Fri Feb 13 05:37:53 2004
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
> #define SCHED_INTERACTIVE(kg) \
> (sched_interact_score(kg) < SCHED_INTERACT_THRESH)
> #define SCHED_CURR(kg, ke) \
> - (ke->ke_thread->td_priority != kg->kg_user_pri || \
> + (ke->ke_thread->td_priority < kg->kg_user_pri || \
> SCHED_INTERACTIVE(kg))
>
> /*
> @@ -1166,11 +1166,8 @@
> */
> if ((ke->ke_flags & KEF_ASSIGNED) == 0) {
> if (TD_IS_RUNNING(td)) {
> - if (td->td_proc->p_flag & P_SA) {
> - kseq_load_rem(KSEQ_CPU(ke->ke_cpu), ke);
> - setrunqueue(td);
> - } else
> - kseq_runq_add(KSEQ_SELF(), ke);
> + kseq_load_rem(KSEQ_CPU(ke->ke_cpu), ke);
> + setrunqueue(td);
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040318023045.GE3018>