Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:14:34 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 mbuf.9 src/sys/compat/ndis kern_ndis.c src/sys/dev/cxgb cxgb_sge.c src/sys/dev/cxgb/ulp/tom cxgb_cpl_socket.c src/sys/dev/hatm if_hatm_intr.c src/sys/dev/iscsi/initiator isc_soc.c src/sys/dev/lge if_lge.c ... Message-ID: <1794.1202062474@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:49:08 %2B0300." <20080202004647.D28725@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20080202004647.D28725@woozle.rinet.ru>, Dmitry Morozovsky writes: >Dear Poul-Henning, > >On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >PK> No MFC is anticipated. > >Provided current age of 7.* is short enough (and most users of it are aware of >possible API changes) why don't you think MFC to RELENG_7 is suitable? If people see a reason for this, and want to take the battle, fine with me. Given what RELENG_7 has been through already, I'm not going to throw this particular nit under the wheel, in particular since I still don't know if the change (via the sendfile SF_SYNC it enables) makes any difference at all for the Varnish HTTP accellerator which drove this change. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1794.1202062474>