Date: 13 May 1998 10:12:18 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, core@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD Message-ID: <xzpvhrar3ml.fsf@hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of "Wed, 13 May 1998 00:57:23 -0700" References: <6876.895046243@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> writes:
> Sigh.. If we're to get any further with this, we really really need
> to get out of the realm of the political ("xxx is running our stack!
> We're #1!" :-) and into the realm of the technical. WHY is it better
> than the WIDE stuff? How and where? What are the _specific points of
> comparison_ that we need to be aware of?
Jordan, this is precisely what I am trying to do: compare the two
implementations and find out where and how they differ. However, I
need approval from above to do that. I'm going to do everything I can
to get that approval.
--
Noone else has a .sig like this one.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpvhrar3ml.fsf>