Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:48:09 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-current-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10 Message-ID: <44y4wvz2ie.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <CAG=rPVeBgWS=vMGxSmX8O4QWW77XC2mqDgaiNrFsGrzg47UQYQ@mail.gmail.com> (Craig Rodrigues's message of "Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:43:55 -0700") References: <CAG=rPVct-HzOksM2KQvPuOdf4zgZo__=Oannh0x%2B_JVHEzQyyw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=rPVfkGa7=n-TSqcnP574ry0Au2THbqvAZJfKD5OK9a1FBNw@mail.gmail.com> <20140617200551.07542580A1@chaos.localdomain> <CAG=rPVeBgWS=vMGxSmX8O4QWW77XC2mqDgaiNrFsGrzg47UQYQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: >>>Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to >>>FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD >>>10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT >>>host with bmake? >> >> You would likely need to apply many of the changes made in 10. >> IIRC stable/9 has just enough bmake support to be able to build/install >> bmake itself, so that ports can use it. >> >> I'm not sure how many people would appreciate making such changes to >> stable/9 at this point. > > Most users would not care about building stable/9 on a stable/10 host. > There are only a few people care about being able to do that. > People who use poudriere to build a jail to build ports would care. Couldn't they just build the base in that same jail?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44y4wvz2ie.fsf>