Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 13:07:16 +0100 From: "Kristof Provost" <kp@FreeBSD.org> To: "=?utf-8?q?Bart=C5=82omiej?= Rutkowski" <robak@freebsd.org> Cc: "Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, git@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pull requests Message-ID: <5D8FF3CD-422C-489A-B009-454CA1031E5E@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAGFrfxa3LPY6VM0wbfCbvaOinKHGOCVCBEjbrLBMoFumNWg3zA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANCZdfoT%2B9nHqS2qYuf_-sBAYDAzH=2ePW=ADPwGhjUG00S2Jw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGFrfxZRUWryg8nHQ2gGbrcZ1U1EgsaSVfpn_mgortmih99fAQ@mail.gmail.com> <C6BF03E7-64B8-4183-9095-76C5757FAF3C@FreeBSD.org> <CAGFrfxa3LPY6VM0wbfCbvaOinKHGOCVCBEjbrLBMoFumNWg3zA@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 1 Mar 2017, at 13:00, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote: > Don't get me wrong, I am simply trying to understand what exactly > would > that accomplish - see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9649. Lets, for a > fun > thought experiment, imagine it was an GH pull request that was > transferred > to Phabric. What now? 2 weeks passed and nothing happened. Would any > policy > fix that? > No, the best policy in the world isn’t going to fix lack of time. It might help a little if these at least all land on the same pile, but it’s not going to magic up reviewers. I’m not sure anything would. A possibly policy answer would be that reviews are automatically closed after a while. It’s not great, but at least the submitter knows that nothing is going to happen. Leaving it open forever also accomplishes nothing. Regards, Kristofhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5D8FF3CD-422C-489A-B009-454CA1031E5E>