Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 May 2020 16:12:26 -0400
From:      Ryan Moeller <freqlabs@FreeBSD.org>
To:        rgrimes@freebsd.org, Ryan Moeller <freqlabs@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r361066 - head/usr.sbin/jail
Message-ID:  <ceab2e95-b4b6-c969-838a-8014f279220a@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <202005151924.04FJOoQM087849@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
References:  <202005151924.04FJOoQM087849@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/15/20 3:24 PM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:

>> On 5/15/20 6:18 AM, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/15/20 1:38 AM, Ryan Moeller wrote:
>>>> Author: freqlabs
>>>> Date: Thu May 14 23:38:11 2020
>>>> New Revision: 361066
>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361066
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>>     jail: Add exec.prepare and exec.release command hooks
>>>>     
>>>>     This change introduces new jail command hooks that run before and after any
>>>>     other actions.
>>> Should it go into RELNOTES?
>> I'm not sure what all the criteria are for relnotes.
>> The committer's guide makes it seem like relnotes is for breaking
>> changes, which this is not.
> Please could you point at which specific language in the commiters
> guide makes you believe that the RELNOTES are for breaking changes?

Every mention of "release notes" in the document is in the context of 
deprecating, removing,
or breaking things, with one exception:

 > Relnotes:    If the change is a candidate for inclusion in the 
release notes for the next release from the branch, set to yes.
>
> RELNOTES should be for all changes that have user visible impact
> of any type.
>
>> -Ryan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ceab2e95-b4b6-c969-838a-8014f279220a>