Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:35:46 +0000
From:      "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org>
To:        Qing Li <qingli@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, Juli Mallett <jmallett@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r205024 - head/sys/net
Message-ID:  <821C1A82-27B6-4E09-9B56-93A687BE6445@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <9ace436c1003121056q1ebc90f6gf9f87c54dd187a20@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201003111756.o2BHukJu042449@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1003112128020.97017@fledge.watson.org> <9ace436c1003111530s3bd0de9cq451671909fb6aa64@mail.gmail.com> <eaa228be1003111535s12febe62x91124b0a015fd0ff@mail.gmail.com> <9ace436c1003111539t2af8439cn315c695d4b90e28d@mail.gmail.com> <eaa228be1003111607s4e78fe73k26a67161642d510d@mail.gmail.com> <4B99EA09.80108@elischer.org> <20100312151931.GS37184@FreeBSD.org> <9ace436c1003121056q1ebc90f6gf9f87c54dd187a20@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mar 12, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Qing Li wrote:

> Right now I like to implement Robert's suggestion of using =
if_capabilities
> field. I'd like to create a new flag, IFCAP_LINKSTATE_NOTIFY flag.
> The routing decision will check against the if_link_state if this bit
> is set.
>=20
> Only a handful of drivers have this capability. So updating those =
drivers
> is a small task.
>=20
> Do we agree on this approach?

I'm good with this approach -- do you mind going with IFCAP_LINKSTATE or =
something similarly a bit shorter? Most of the other capability names =
are pretty short, and it will prevent the display in ifconfig from =
growing too much as the capability will be common.

Thanks!

Robert=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?821C1A82-27B6-4E09-9B56-93A687BE6445>