Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:50:04 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Hukins <tom@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/48366: Update to Dialup firewalling with FreeBSD... Message-ID: <200302180650.h1I6o4Oh081328@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/48366; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Hukins <tom@FreeBSD.org> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/48366: Update to Dialup firewalling with FreeBSD... Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 06:49:40 +0000 I have a few comments on what looks like a useful patch: On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:47:47AM -0800, Sean Chittenden wrote: > + <para>Enables the new version of IPFW.</para> > + <important><para>Only do this if you're running FreeBSD 4.X, > + this is the default in newer versions of > + FreeBSD.</para></important> These a re two separate clauses, so a semicolon or full stop would be more appropriate after "4.X". > - <para>If so, you will need to specifically disable > + <para>If so, you will need to specifically disable In addition, s/will need/need/. > - <title>The ruleset for the firewall</title> > + <title>The rule set for the firewall</title> I notice we use "ruleset" and "rule set" inconsistently through doc and www - I agree that we should prefer "rule set". Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302180650.h1I6o4Oh081328>