Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 15:02:38 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: phk@dk.tfs.com Cc: terry@lambert.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISODEVMAP in cd9660 ? Message-ID: <199704152202.PAA25865@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <212.861139167@critter> from "phk@dk.tfs.com" at Apr 15, 97 11:19:27 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Get a grip Terry, those bits are not #ifdef SOMETHINGCRYPTIC... ISODEVMAP isn't that cryptic, IMO. Like I said, devfs will obviate the need for the thing for bootable CDROM's anyway, so it, in particular, should go *if* devfs becomes standard, in any case. But the "undocumented" justification for diking out code is not universally applicable: it was a hedge to use that as the justification. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704152202.PAA25865>