Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 09:00:08 PDT From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> To: dg@root.com Cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-sbin@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/dump dumprmt.c Message-ID: <98May17.090011pdt.177519@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 17 May 98 00:48:08 PDT." <199805170748.AAA16545@implode.root.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message <199805170748.AAA16545@implode.root.com> you write: >> The rdump request/response protocol can not invoke Nagle and cannot cause >> SWS, so this has no negative effects. > > "should not"...clearly it _can_! :-) It does not actually cause SWS despite triggering SWS avoidance. I was just trying to make it clear that I have thought about this and am sure that rdump is not suddenly going to start bashing WANs because of this change. Billhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?98May17.090011pdt.177519>