Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 May 1998 09:00:08 PDT
From:      Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
To:        dg@root.com
Cc:        Bill Fenner <fenner@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-sbin@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/dump dumprmt.c 
Message-ID:  <98May17.090011pdt.177519@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 17 May 98 00:48:08 PDT." <199805170748.AAA16545@implode.root.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199805170748.AAA16545@implode.root.com> you write:
>>   The rdump request/response protocol can not invoke Nagle and cannot cause
>>   SWS, so this has no negative effects.
>
>   "should not"...clearly it _can_! :-)

It does not actually cause SWS despite triggering SWS avoidance.  I
was just trying to make it clear that I have thought about this and
am sure that rdump is not suddenly going to start bashing WANs because
of this change.

  Bill



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?98May17.090011pdt.177519>