Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:09:31 -0500 (EST)
From:      Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Review/Test: Pseudo-device unit number management patch
Message-ID:  <20040219025604.D76134@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040218.063204.74403147.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <200402170846.17399.freebsd-current@webteckies.org> <20040218.063204.74403147.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, M. Warner Losh wrote:

> In message: <39796.1077013415@critter.freebsd.dk>
>             "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
> : Current our handing is that if it disappears, it's gone, if it comes
> : back it's probably a new one anyway.
>
> Yes.  If the hardware goes away and comes back, it can be very
> difficult to know if you have the same hardware or different
> hardware.  This is less true of network cards, but definitely true of
> CF cards (which can easily be identical from inspection, but have
> different contents).

The likes of ATA disks include serial numbers in words 10-19. These could
be used to positively identify a drive when its availability has come
into question. From what I recall, CF cards use an ATA-like command set.
Wouldn't it be possible to get the serial number and model from them for
positive identification?

Regards,
Andy

> Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant >
> Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/    >



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040219025604.D76134>