Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:30:18 -0700 From: "Crist J . Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net> To: Konan Houphoue <bahobab@hotmail.com> Cc: ari@suutari.iki.fi, marcs@draenor.org, archie@whistle.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, virtual_olympus@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Port 80 redirect: Good news!! Message-ID: <20000921103018.B30474@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> In-Reply-To: <F3o3DjFbUcOV1EetVoM00000b3d@hotmail.com>; from bahobab@hotmail.com on Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 09:26:28AM -0500 References: <F3o3DjFbUcOV1EetVoM00000b3d@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 09:26:28AM -0500, Konan Houphoue wrote:
> #If you're using 'options BRIDGE', uncomment the following line to pass ARP
> ${fwcmd} add 300 pass udp from 0.0.0.0 2054 to 0.0.0.0
>
> I believe it is uncommented to keep the 2 interfaces on different network
> but yet allowing local traffic on this computer.
You are doing routing and NAT on this gateway, AND it is a bridge?!
That's not a great idea. Did you really put,
options BRIDGE
In the kernel and flip the sysctl switches to turn bridging on?
--
Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000921103018.B30474>