Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:28:15 -0800 (PST) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) Cc: cwasser@v-wave.com (Chris Wasser), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dc0 wierdness with Compex Freedomline Message-ID: <200002251828.KAA71012@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <200002251808.NAA30934@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> from Garrett Wollman at "Feb 25, 2000 01:08:01 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> <<On Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:53:37 -0800 (PST), "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> said: > > > I specifically excluded P(coll) by stating point to point or effectively > > point to point via switching. > > Rod, please bother to READ what people write before spewing nonsense. I did read it, and did not spew nonsense. P(coll) is non-sense when talking about maximal. > The original question asked SPECIFICALLY about half-duplex. It also asked about ``maximal'', I solved the equations for maximal, to achive maximal P(coll)=0. > I answered SPECIFICALLY about half-duplex. The duplex does not in any way effect the maximal link layer transmission data rate. You seem to keep forgetting the maximal part... -- Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200002251828.KAA71012>