Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:16:13 -0800 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My planned work on networking stack Message-ID: <20040302221619.24D4743D31@mx1.FreeBSD.org> References: <4043B6BA.B847F081@freebsd.org> <200403011507.52238.wes@softweyr.com> <20040302031625.GA4061@scylla.towardex.com> <20040302042957.GH3841@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20040302082625.GE22985@cell.sick.ru> <20040302084321.GA21729@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040302085556.GA23734@cell.sick.ru> <20040302092825.GD884@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20040302095134.GA24078@cell.sick.ru> <40449B8E.A48B39B0@freebsd.org> <20040302160902.GB26977@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I do not insist that AS pathes in kernel are good idea. If you > show me an other way to get AS information when constructing > netflow exports in kernel, I'd be thankful. do we need to rediscover why flow export places a large processor burden on criscos, junipers, prockets, ...? randy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040302221619.24D4743D31>