Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:39:43 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> To: Johan Karlsson <johan@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib realpath.3 realpath.c src/bin/realpath realpath.c Message-ID: <20030115183943.D58850@espresso.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <200301152122.h0FLMtdE034299@repoman.freebsd.org>; from johan@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:22:55PM -0800 References: <200301152122.h0FLMtdE034299@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Johan Karlsson <johan@FreeBSD.org> writes: > johan 2003/01/15 13:22:55 PST > > Modified files: > lib/libc/stdlib realpath.3 realpath.c > bin/realpath realpath.c > Log: > realpath(3) should use PATH_MAX instead of MAXPATHLEN according to POSIX. > > This also reverts the PATH_MAX -> MAXPATHLEN part of > rev 1.3 of src/bin/realpath/realpath.c > > Requested by: imp > Reviewed by: imp, bde > > Revision Changes Path > 1.5 +1 -1 src/bin/realpath/realpath.c > 1.12 +2 -2 src/lib/libc/stdlib/realpath.3 > 1.12 +7 -7 src/lib/libc/stdlib/realpath.c Hmm, I thought it was more complicated than this. IIRC, PATH_MAX isn't necessarily available at compile-time, so it needs more complications to conform to POSIX in the case where PATH_MAX isn't defined. Portablility might not be important, in which case it isn't clear why we would change from MAXPATHLEN to PATH_MAX or vice versa. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030115183943.D58850>