Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:11:12 -0400 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org>, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net>, freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10 Message-ID: <20140620041112.GS1218@hub.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <FC1B2983-4B49-4480-855E-6BD09B148F31@bsdimp.com> References: <CAG=rPVct-HzOksM2KQvPuOdf4zgZo__=Oannh0x%2B_JVHEzQyyw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=rPVfkGa7=n-TSqcnP574ry0Au2THbqvAZJfKD5OK9a1FBNw@mail.gmail.com> <20140617200551.07542580A1@chaos.localdomain> <CAG=rPVeBgWS=vMGxSmX8O4QWW77XC2mqDgaiNrFsGrzg47UQYQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140617211436.GI1248@hub.FreeBSD.org> <CAG=rPVezMsPCP%2BB1ePw_Mh=Cv6qx07ordsWQ3cF4a_ytLWeCEQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=rPVd4evnkJoz1rVeMjP7YNKOW0BWF0MvSrFQ3u2xCiVEtmw@mail.gmail.com> <690CE378-D7D9-49A6-BC20-13FD540E63A2@FreeBSD.org> <CAG=rPVfanU=FVWPd768_G5NjXRHnUH5o05%2BKwFeLaTQqU3Ux8w@mail.gmail.com> <FC1B2983-4B49-4480-855E-6BD09B148F31@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--p2u4WfPhYOuYlOsk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:00:03PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 > On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrot= e: > >>=20 > >> See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner, > >> unfortunately. This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which > >> was *not* redundant. :-/ > >=20 > >=20 > > Warner, > >=20 > > Is there a way to bring back the behavior of r257658 but without > > the way it was implemented with the EARLY_BUILD flag? > > It would be handy, as we can see by this thread discussion. >=20 > OK. I must be daft, or maybe just missing something. But I can build 9.3 = almost branch point on a current jail running on a 10.x system (to simulate= the 9 on current case). I don=E2=80=99t see the problem being talked about= at all. As for 9 on 10, I was also able to do a build, but my 10.x system = may not have been pristine. >=20 Removal of EARLY_BUILD is not the issue here, I have no idea where the hell the came into play. It is a race in the chain with what make(1) gets built for the stable/9 userland. It is why the 'make make buildworld' thing I mentioned works. Glen --p2u4WfPhYOuYlOsk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTo7RgAAoJELls3eqvi17QeoUP/2JIqBaHMCPVFtQGXEo3GVkb s3z3R3qadTH+hucDyMTg21iZNFW5b5YaIJfoNvHcmaVQ6HK/TTV8U/Fob9TyPMpe q5ZMqq6hQUrPMHkXUJD3YEQojQucxDKL2qojjlII2ZW5hAaDvOaq/yLQlELiM8JY yMQ778V94qzFmWdeYhV8uKLJBtaCDm9aJKufbg2SkHevayMTBq6VCde/blY7Gh4I wOFy6Z5yhjdPD4jY+I9ErMkCBMiBE+64/wsDPZseQ12Zq+nxriDDjLS9hkVPt6lt LxlaMSO0AuisT1My0RtrkhMmFGYiMNEp99un8XVvKYkbQHqtT8stG9nCRa8qTeNi xCRkOhxpb8GMinjU0/GWzQurN/pl2KjdGSCUFdo2tet0wu2sqBkDgDzmteAGT3P+ HOCyUsZyvd61Y9RV6zt9kfVdVweJbFFCKlF6/jesN5pN0vXK6vLFU37meLAM6Hx0 k74DIS2197Ud3ToBPQDYl0Q2t0maLZWB/AizWbo/IDg914ChIew+D1qzuXOMXf49 MI/5Z88xv2by7d1ynp5Fa4dB0L+QQG0sFeu5wpa04z/RTnPwKryEMI4Q7OiS2wZ3 8Eojp1X/isf/xEUbnWVPFEM55+4eeRUJexInfvplpokoajHFf3BAtcxENPvTf5iD oI1i+mn1GB5JbUFMg5x5 =8nBJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p2u4WfPhYOuYlOsk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140620041112.GS1218>