Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:11:10 +0700 From: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: FreeBSD entry on Wikipedia Message-ID: <1148288725.20050623031110@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <4E4F19D4-F10F-4F15-AF9D-B1FCCEB6FFF9@glbx.net> References: <6F2F8FD3FBCF7A489CB18912A4807EBA0E0851@mvwcim1a.acuson.com> <42B76191.1040402@buckhorn.net> <4E4F19D4-F10F-4F15-AF9D-B1FCCEB6FFF9@glbx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Andy, Thursday, June 23, 2005, 3:03:20 AM, you wrote: AG> On 21 Jun 2005, at 01:38, Bob Martin wrote: >> IMHO, if they can roll out a patch to a major security flaw in a >> day, they should have been able to fix the uptime clock at some >> point in the last decade. Odd that MS can do something that Linux >> can't. AG> This was fixed about 3 years ago. Sure? So why Netcraft states about it aven nowadays? Even more, it says that some versions of FreeBSD (newer, as I understood) also wrap that uptime counter? -- Best regards, Vadim Goncharov ICQ UIN 166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1148288725.20050623031110>