Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 May 1997 16:43:23 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Stephen A. Derdau" <sderdau@xtdl.com>
To:        The Devil Himself <fullermd@narcissus.ml.org>
Cc:        Pat McPartland <mcp@blast.net>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, FBSD questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: 2.1.5 or 2.2.1
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.970515164258.6421C-100000@user.xtdl.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96.970515131555.9663A-100000@narcissus.ml.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Great We have 2.2.1.  I'll have to check the version of appache though!

Stephen A. Derdau
XTDL inc
603 4714700		"It's just a matter of perspective"
	

On Thu, 15 May 1997, The Devil Himself wrote:

> On Thu, 15 May 1997, Stephen A. Derdau wrote:
> 
> > Yes please let me know also....WE also are an ISP and are meeting
> > tonight to discuss an upgrade.  Which version of FreeBSD do you need
> > to run front page extensions is all that I would add.
> > 
> > Thank You
> > 
> > 
> > Stephen A. Derdau
> > XTDL inc
> > 603 4714700		"It's just a matter of perspective"
> The company I work for is running 2.1-STABLE systems, and we have
> frontpage extensions on.  I don't think it matters what verison of
> FreeeBSD you're using acvtually; just what version of the web server
> (Apache, in our case) you are running.
> 
> > 	
> > 
> > On Thu, 15 May 1997, Pat McPartland wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello,
> > > I am an ISP.  I have to upgrade my webserver.  Should I upgrade to 2.1.5 or
> > > 2.2.1?  I have the CDs, but I'm not sure which would be better.   I was
> > > thinking of upgrading to 2.2.1 since I have it, but I read a message in the
> > > archives discouraging 2.2.1?  Any advice?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Pat
> > > 
> > > Patrick McPartland		 
> > > mcp@blast.net		
> 
> Go with 2.2.1.
> There have been some problems with 2.2, which is why 2.2.1 came out, but
> anything before 2.1.6 had a fair-sized security hole, plus there are a lot
> of features in 2.2.1 that would be nice on a system that's going to take
> some load.
> 
> Hope it helps!!
> 
> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
> |FreeBSD is good.      FreeBSD is our friend.     UNIX is our god.|
> *Micro$oft is bad.                      Micro$oft causes problems.*
> |MicroBSD???      I DON'T THINK SO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!|
> |"I hate quotes in signature files"            :-}  MAtthew Fuller|
> *fullermd@narcissus.ml.org                          FreeBSD junkie*
> |http://keystone.westminster.edu/~fullermd     Westminster College|
> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
> 
> 
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970515164258.6421C-100000>