Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:47:00 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice Java downloads Message-ID: <18164.11716.377920.986490@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <46F421A9.1090102@hdk5.net> References: <46F41ABC.70802@hdk5.net> <20070921153237.cec72878.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <46F421A9.1090102@hdk5.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
NetOpsCenter writes: > Bill Moran wrote: > >Is there any reason you can't use OOo 2.X? > > So I really dont care what the version is so long as the file > names reflect what the freebsd install error 1 gives when it > finishes its part. 1) Have you asked on the openoffice@ mailing list? 2) I'm with Bill - about the only reason to prefer 1.1 to 2.2.1 is lack of disk space. 3) I know from experience a suitable jdk is required (at least during compilation) for the 2.x series to handle OpenDocument formats. But the last I heard, it handles other formats natively. Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18164.11716.377920.986490>