Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:37:07 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz> To: "J.S." <johann@broadpark.no> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ---> Upgrading 'qt-2.3.1' to 'qt-2.3.1_1' (x11-toolkits/qt23) Message-ID: <20020130213707.B536@grimoire.chen.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20020130091311.17eda673.johann@broadpark.no>; from johann@broadpark.no on Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:13:11AM %2B0100 References: <20020130091311.17eda673.johann@broadpark.no>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:13:11AM +0100, J.S. wrote:
> ---> Upgrading 'qt-2.3.1' to 'qt-2.3.1_1' (x11-toolkits/qt23)
>
> Why does portupgrade always have to upgrade from portname-X.X to
> portname-X.X_1?
The "_{12345}" suffix indicates that the port-maintainer has made a
siginificant change to the port that it warrants a version bump.
Cheers.
--
Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck" - Curly
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020130213707.B536>