Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:43:31 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adjust binutils to quiesce -Wstring-plus-int Message-ID: <20131031034331.GA57300@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgns-Cvj%2BiNJvxNx5xVukAhj2jDd4OQvCSEiiqcuX_oscQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <1383180558.1751.12.camel@localhost> <CAF6rxgns-Cvj%2BiNJvxNx5xVukAhj2jDd4OQvCSEiiqcuX_oscQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:40:40PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Sean Bruno <sean_bruno@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Spent some time doing string maths today. > > > > More or less, change the "static char intel_syntax" to an int and use it > > as an array index instead of doing pointer math. > > > > Sean > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/binutils_opcodes.txt > > While the patch seems reasonable, I once again am confused about why > we are fixing these warnings and not just disabling them for > contributed code. +1 -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131031034331.GA57300>