Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:29:46 +0200 From: ArnoB <freebsd@rgbaz.eu> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EABI 4 vs EABI 5? Message-ID: <55B5DDEA.6070602@rgbaz.eu> In-Reply-To: <96059129-D5DB-4610-9F3C-AF3803610D0E@bsdimp.com> References: <55B57895.30909@rgbaz.eu> <96059129-D5DB-4610-9F3C-AF3803610D0E@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27-07-15 05:40, Warner Losh wrote: >> On Jul 26, 2015, at 6:17 PM, ArnoB <freebsd@rgbaz.eu> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to compile FreeBSD 11 head on a FreeBSD 9.3 amd64 >> machine, to be used on my Raspberry B. >> >> TARGET: arm >> TARGET_ARCH: armv6 >> >> Everything goes quite well, yet I'm seeing a slight difference between >> the binaries in the temporary installation folder and the ones on >> the Raspberry Pi. >> >> >> on the PC, FreeBSD 9.3 amd64: >> $ file /bin/ls >> /bin/ls: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, EABI4 version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, >> interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1, FreeBSD-style, for FreeBSD 11.0 (1100077), stripped >> >> on the RasPi, FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT: >> $ file temp/bin/ls >> temp/bin/ls: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, EABI4 version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, >> interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1, FreeBSD-style, for FreeBSD 11.0 (1100077), stripped >> >> Almost identical, except for the EABI version. >> >> >> Is it possible to get exactly similar binaries in any way? > They both should run, possibly with some compat9 libraries. I don’t think we have a package for that. > > However, I think the problem maybe a clang-built system vs a gcc-built system. > > Warner > Hi Warner, Thanks for your reply. I didn't think of gcc vs clang at all.... I'll install clang, rerun the whole build process, and check if that "solved" it. greets arno
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55B5DDEA.6070602>