Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 11:33:33 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tooling Integration and Developer Experience Message-ID: <Y9ec/fbWPodGjyoP@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BPGaYD4nRtodOxZWdd11f1eXrP_EXxYRGLY4f3PpvNw-ViyrA@mail.gmail.com> References: <202301300254.30U2sm0k061914@dell.no.berklix.net> <97020cad-f913-2985-2093-e4c23bf671e3@antonovs.family> <86357sxsly.fsf@cthulhu.stephaner.labo.int> <CA%2BPGaYD4nRtodOxZWdd11f1eXrP_EXxYRGLY4f3PpvNw-ViyrA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, > I had a similar thing happen to me, the mailing list FreeBSD-doc seemed to > exist as if no one existed, and there was no one posting in it except for > the automated bug reports from the bots. > I have not had any replies to my several posts either. > So can the admins tell how many people actually > subscribe to FreeBSD-doc, The list has 496 subscribers right now. (speaking as one of postmaster@). > or is this just a place to report bugs and people > should discuss FreeBSD doc-related issues elsewhere? Or is it that almost > nobody cares about the FreeBSD documentation? >From my observation, the last few month led to a huge pile of workload on many folks that are involved with FreeBSD stuff, so not many folks had time to reply/think things through/answer. I had the same problem... I see doc-stuff happen mostly on reviews.freebsd.org. (speaking as one of phabric-admins). Pau Amma is the most active docs-person as far as I can see. I have not calculated stats, just my gut feeling. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Y9ec/fbWPodGjyoP>