Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 11:06:14 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: =?KOI8-R?Q?Andrey_Chernov=2C_=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= <ache@nagual.ru> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.freebsd.org>, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-include@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include utmp.h Message-ID: <9893.849812774@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 05 Dec 1996 21:11:26 %2B0300." <Pine.BSF.3.95.961205210444.222A-100000@nagual.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> We already change UT_NAMESIZE, lets change UT_HOSTSIZE in the same round > :-) I agree that we should batch all these changes, and quickly before people start firing at us for breaking their utmp logs multiple times in a row. Simple questions: Is there concensus for bumping UT_HOSTSIZE to the next increment? 32 or 64? What about the other fields that Peter suggested? Assuming that we can reach a quick consensus on this, I'd be happy to see Peter go ahead and Just Do It. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9893.849812774>