Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:54:04 +0300 (MSK)
From:      Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To:        Melvyn Sopacua <freebsd-current@webteckies.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Jails that keep hanging around
Message-ID:  <20040215215230.N13958@news1.macomnet.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200402151944.33290.freebsd-current@webteckies.org>
References:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040215130356.56481G-100000@fledge.watson.org> <200402151944.33290.freebsd-current@webteckies.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, 19:44+0100, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:

> On Sunday 15 February 2004 19:39, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > Robert,
> >
> > Thank you very much for your summary.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > Should I worry about these jails or is it harmless:
> > >
> > > It's probably harmless unless there's a leak.  Jails are fairly
> > > light-weight objects, so if it takes a little longer to GC due to TCP,
> > > it's OK.  On the other hand, if there's a leak, that's very bad;
> > > likewise,
> >
> > It is a leak.  I proveded a how to repeat sequence in my previous
> > reply to this thread.
>
> Actually - your example suggests a connection hanging around, but in my case,
> `netstat -an' doesn't show any connection on the ip. More to follow (poking

Sure, they are GC after TIME_WAIT expires.

> around sys/kern/kern_jail.c to try and get the value p->pr_ref).

-- 
Maxim Konovalov



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040215215230.N13958>