Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 20:25:34 +0200 From: Andreas Kohn <andreas.kohn@gmx.net> To: Alex Varju <alex@varju.ca> Cc: "'freebsd-java@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-java@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.1M7 Message-ID: <1116699934.887.2.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> In-Reply-To: <428F7890.8070305@varju.ca> References: <1116675388.23739.4.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> <428F7890.8070305@varju.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-gIIzfORPKQBVK2ymu13f Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 11:06 -0700, Alex Varju wrote: > I've actually already submitted an update for the eclipse-devel port to=20 > 3.1m7, somebody just needs to grab it: >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D81076 Will test this right away, thanks!=20 /me feels slow :) > I discussed adding FreeBSD as a supported platform with one of the=20 > Eclipse developers, but I'm not sure how feasible this is. The problem=20 > is that somebody still has to maintain the config files within the=20 > Eclipse tree, which isn't going to happen unless a FreeBSD developer has=20 > commit priviledges. >=20 > I agree that porting Eclipse is a huge challenge right now, I'm just not=20 > sure how it the overall amount of work for everybody involved can be=20 > reduced. Perhaps we could arrange it like OO.o or bsd# or the BSD Java thing...external patchset which is managed somehow centrally? I don't know either actually, but I feel that following Eclipse becomes more difficult with each code drop.=20 -- Andreas --=-gIIzfORPKQBVK2ymu13f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCj30eYucd7Ow1ygwRAuyZAJ4gFNPRW83Qjhmu2NVQcBUokT60EgCgkI3Q ZoSWyVagAhqqYHWNyltI4Pg= =w7gu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gIIzfORPKQBVK2ymu13f--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1116699934.887.2.camel>