Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 20:25:34 +0200 From: Andreas Kohn <andreas.kohn@gmx.net> To: Alex Varju <alex@varju.ca> Cc: "'freebsd-java@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-java@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.1M7 Message-ID: <1116699934.887.2.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> In-Reply-To: <428F7890.8070305@varju.ca> References: <1116675388.23739.4.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> <428F7890.8070305@varju.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 11:06 -0700, Alex Varju wrote: > I've actually already submitted an update for the eclipse-devel port to > 3.1m7, somebody just needs to grab it: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=81076 Will test this right away, thanks! /me feels slow :) > I discussed adding FreeBSD as a supported platform with one of the > Eclipse developers, but I'm not sure how feasible this is. The problem > is that somebody still has to maintain the config files within the > Eclipse tree, which isn't going to happen unless a FreeBSD developer has > commit priviledges. > > I agree that porting Eclipse is a huge challenge right now, I'm just not > sure how it the overall amount of work for everybody involved can be > reduced. Perhaps we could arrange it like OO.o or bsd# or the BSD Java thing...external patchset which is managed somehow centrally? I don't know either actually, but I feel that following Eclipse becomes more difficult with each code drop. -- Andreas [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCj30eYucd7Ow1ygwRAuyZAJ4gFNPRW83Qjhmu2NVQcBUokT60EgCgkI3Q ZoSWyVagAhqqYHWNyltI4Pg= =w7gu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1116699934.887.2.camel>