Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:29:17 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMART Message-ID: <20091113011419.Y57967@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <hdh51t$8sh$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <20091112103308.GA2536@hiMolde.no> <20091112115350.GA18542@icarus.home.lan> <hdguqv$isj$1@ger.gmane.org> <288A7D7F-C247-4493-8ED1-E67FFC3E0201@exscape.org> <hdh0l7$ocv$1@ger.gmane.org> <20091112133221.00006b43@unknown> <hdh2ub$n7$1@ger.gmane.org> <4AFC166B.1040502@andric.com> <hdh51t$8sh$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Ivan Voras wrote: > Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 2009-11-12 14:35, Ivan Voras wrote: > > > I've seen it. But I don't remember if they addressed the problem of > > > nonstandard interpretations of statistics? > > > > Note the statistics you quoted are "Vendor Specific SMART Attributes", > > so it is quite logical for different vendors to have different > > statistics. :) > > I see your point :) > > Though I would hope that a statistics like: > > 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 087 083 006 Pre-fail Always > - 45398197 > > would have an equivalent across vendors :) I know, it's too much to ask :) True .. but all you really need to know is that as far as your disk vendor is concerned, your error rate is 87 (somethings), the worst it's ever been is 83 and if it were nearer 6 somethings, you should worry :) 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 089 089 000 Old_age Always - 10155 Seagate says you're only 11% on the way to (mean) oblivion .. if you believe it should run 11.4 years. We had one 4GB IBM drive that did! cheers, Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091113011419.Y57967>