Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:36:34 +0100 From: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: names of supfiles in /usr/share/examples/cvsup Message-ID: <200412061936.35851.freebsd@redesjm.local> In-Reply-To: <41B40C97.7000102@yahoo.com> References: <41B40C97.7000102@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El Lunes, 6 de Diciembre de 2004 08:39, Rob escribi=F3: > Hi, > > For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's: > > stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable > standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current > > I find this naming rather confusing. Why "stable" refers to STABLE, > but "standard" refers to CURRENT ? > > This causes unnecessary confusion. Why not the following name > convention: > > release-supfile : for FreeBSD-RELEASE Better security-supfile. There is just one release, things like=20 RELENG_5_3 are security branchs, not release branchs. > stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-STABLE > current-supfile : for FreeBSD-CURRENT > =2D- josemi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200412061936.35851.freebsd>