Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 22:59:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: deperlifying sockstat(1) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0205022258430.80897-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20020503034140.C4801-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have used it from time to time with Netstat and fstat to try find which process had the suspect session.. On Fri, 3 May 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Wed, 1 May 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 May 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > > In message <xzp8z73pjh6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > > > >I'm working on a C version of sockstat(1), and to complete it I need > > > >to do nasty stuff like using libkvm and defining _KERNEL before > > > >including some headers (see fstat). I'm starting to think that it > > > >would be easier to just make a kern.sockstat sysctl node, and make > > > >sockstat(1) a #!/bin/sh wrapper around sysctl(8). Ideas? > > > > > > sysctl is way better than libkvm because it provides a chance > > > for presentation. > > > > unless sockstat gets a -N -M capacity such as teh other similar programs.. > > Who uses this? No one complained when it was broken for vmstat -m. > > Bruce > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0205022258430.80897-100000>