Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:23:28 +0200 From: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> To: Jalle <defacto@home.se> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is FreeBSD so SLOW? Message-ID: <20030423132328.7e7e7f3d.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030423122449.0244a058@pop3.hbg.bonet.se> References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030423122449.0244a058@pop3.hbg.bonet.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=.64VPjXFUBVAL8.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:04:08 +0200
Jalle <defacto@home.se> wrote:
Howdy,
> First of all, I just want to say that this mail is not meant to offend
> anyone, and that it is a technical oriented mail, only with a tint of
> "computer theology". I don't wish to start another one of those "holy
> wars"-threads (FreeBSD vs Linux vs Windows kinda), I just want to
> sort some stuff out.
Well, you're message sounds like a blatant troll, but I'll answer it
anyway :)
> Now, everyone says that FreeBSD is supposed to be so fast and
> reliable. Reliable, I fully agree! But fast? No, it's actually much
> slower on my machine than any Windows distro ever was! Sure, only
You're comparing apples and oranges here.
> running in text mode is fast as hell, but no good for everyday use.
> I've tried several WMs and Desktop Suites, like Enlightenment (e16 and
> e17), Blackbox, Gnome2, KDE3 etc. They're great n' all, but as soon as
> I switch to graphical UI everything slows down to a snail's pace! Even
> a simple terminal is slow.
Have you tried other lighter DE/WMs? XFCE and Icewm come to mind. KDE3
and Gnome2 and not exactly speed demons.
> I've played around with Linux a couple of times, and with several
> flavors (Mandrake, Debian, RedHat, Gentoo), and they where all MUCH
> faster using a graphical interface than FreeBSD!
> I have a Pentium III 450 MHz with 320 MB RAM, a SoundBlaster AWE 64
> Gold and a Matrox G400 MAX video card. I know, this is not
> top-of-the-line hardware, but that doesn't mean that it should run
> three or four (or more) times faster under Linux, right?
Your ask for technical answers, but you didn't provide anything to
backup your claims. You don't mention if you're running a Linux kernel
with low-latency patches, which make desktop experience feel faster. I
have a really really hard time believing there's a 4x difference in
performance, specially considering that X is the same on both systems.
Maybe your system is poorly configured. Care to try x11perf on both
systems and paste the results?
> yeah, BTW, is there really NO WAY of getting simultaneous sounds in
> FreeBSD?!? I think that's kinda crappy. I mean MS did it, why can't
> we?
Take your time to google around, you can do it.
> Finally the QUESTION: Why is my FreeBSD box so slow? I figure, if
> FreeBSD in general was so slow, then noone would really use it. Are
> there any "standard tricks" in the book that speeds up a slow X server
> or WM, or just FreeBSD in general?
The only thing I can say is: Where are your patches?
Cheers,
--
Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net
GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt
EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk
Tired of Spam? -> http://www.trustic.com
--=.64VPjXFUBVAL8.
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD4DBQE+pneznLctrNyFFPERAkK1AKC2BH01xLmZmeI15ufKEVXqvEmCVgCY0xs9
Sb32y3OMavs7127xjE2bsw==
=xrJ6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=.64VPjXFUBVAL8.--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030423132328.7e7e7f3d.flynn>