Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:58:40 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk>, "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: still trouble with pci.c on i386 Message-ID: <200912281058.40733.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <86ws072she.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <d873d5be0912201722v6269800bx989510d47ace1888@mail.gmail.com> <20091222174248.GA61700@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <86ws072she.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 28 December 2009 7:27:57 am Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > This discussion is pointless if your source tree is not a Subversion > working copy. That's not true. I still use cvsweb quite often as one can more easily see= =20 what has been MFC'd that way rather than with the svn equivalent. And it i= s=20 easy to use cvsweb to find a particular CVS revision and map it to an SVN=20 revision. =2D-=20 John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200912281058.40733.jhb>