Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 15:19:50 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: FreeBSD-current <current@FreeBSD.ORG>, Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>, Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu>, Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: ppp & HUP. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970703151817.581D-100000@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <33BB1473.33590565@whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Jul 1997, Julian Elischer wrote: > I have processes that close down assuming they have > 5 or 6 seconds to do so when they receive HUP. > it's traditional. I don't like changing such traditions.. It seems you mix SIGHUP and SIGTERM, the exact Tradition was: SIGTERM, 10 secs, SIGKILL There is no SIGHUP in Tradition. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970703151817.581D-100000>