Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 18:35:54 +0200 (MET DST) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) Cc: kjc@csl.sony.co.jp, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bandwidth throttling etc. Message-ID: <199804281635.SAA26842@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980428093256.12427B-100000@current1.whistle.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Apr 28, 98 09:33:17 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> wasn't setsockopt changed to do > 108 in a recent -current? (2 weeks ago?) > > have you a new -current? i am running -stable, and don't want to go -current (at least, not for a thing like this where a one-line change does the job). would it be possible to bring the update to setsockopt() into -stable ? Looks like a simple fix (haven't looked at the code in detail, but what's more than malloc'ing a different, larger mbuf ?) cheers luigi -----------------------------+-------------------------------------- Luigi Rizzo | Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Informazione email: luigi@iet.unipi.it | Universita' di Pisa tel: +39-50-568533 | via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) fax: +39-50-568522 | http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ _____________________________|______________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804281635.SAA26842>