Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 07:28:01 -0400 From: stan <stanb@panix.com> To: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk> Cc: Free BSD Questions list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Acepting lnown "bad" mail? Message-ID: <20060906112801.GA18299@teddy.fas.com> In-Reply-To: <B8A85846D3F4D84D18B36200@Unsupported> References: <20060906105906.GA17195@teddy.fas.com> <B8A85846D3F4D84D18B36200@Unsupported>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:11:12PM +0100, Karl Pielorz wrote: > > --On 06 September 2006 06:59 -0400 stan <stanb@panix.com> wrote: > > >What's going on is that the local sendmail on the new machine is rejecting > >these mails. Like this > > > >Sep 6 06:50:43 brown sm-mta[12249]: k86Ai3w8012249: ruleset=check_mail, > >arg1=<r oot@AW0001.meadwestvaco.com>, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1], > >reject=451 4.1.8 Doma in of sender address root@AW0001.meadwestvaco.com > >does not resolve S > > > >Now I _know_ this is a laformed header, but, (at least right now), I'd > >like for sendmail to just take the mail, without being so picky about it. > >Is there a rule I can tweak to accomplish this? > > Not really a FreeBSD question ;) > > Having said that, you probably need to look at adding: > > FEATURE(accept_unresolvable_domains > > In your sendmail config... > Thanks, I'll give that a try. -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060906112801.GA18299>