Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 09:14:10 -0500 From: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com> To: mika ruohotie <bsdcur@shadows.aeon.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: page fault Message-ID: <19970605091410.05359@right.PCS> In-Reply-To: <199706050940.MAA27014@shadows.aeon.net>; from mika ruohotie on Jun 06, 1997 at 12:40:12PM %2B0300 References: <19970604174918.CS56609@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199706050940.MAA27014@shadows.aeon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 06, 1997 at 12:40:12PM +0300, mika ruohotie wrote: > > > yes, but i failed to get kernel -g:ed. i guess after this i'll use > > > the 'config -g' as default. > > Be careful to not accidentally load this bloated kernel into > > memory. :) Also, i found the time ld(1) requires to link a full -g > > it's only about 9 mgs. why not? it's still less than what win95/nt4.0 > eats when started... besides, i didnt notice slowing (which it probably > causes). memory is cheap. Because it takes an unholy amount of time to load any LKM's into such a gigantic kernel. I don't think I had the patience to wait enough for the mod_load to complete. -- Jonathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970605091410.05359>