Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:22:04 +0900 (JST) From: Nakata Maho <maho.nakata@gmail.com> To: tijl@FreeBSD.org Cc: me@janh.de, bapt@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, stephen@FreeBSD.org, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Subject: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree Message-ID: <20131214.092204.1657898379615247833.maho.nakata@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20131213144723.0def94ed@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <20131201150640.12ea18c8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20131213011204.GA10879@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20131213144723.0def94ed@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Many thanks! From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:47:23 +0100 > On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: >> I see the octave port is still broken. >> >> After a clean install on my self, removing all installed ports, >> reverting my local chnages in /usr/pors, and rebuilding all ports, >> I'm see the original problem. >> >> % octave >> Segmentation fault (core dumped) >> >> PLEASE, commit your patch ASAP. > > Committed in r336344. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131214.092204.1657898379615247833.maho.nakata>