Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:51:03 +0200 From: Natacha =?iso-8859-1?Q?Port=E9?= <natbsd@instinctive.eu> To: matt <sendtomatt@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Subject: Re: How can I help with thinkpad x220 issues? Message-ID: <20120704075103.GC31763@sigil.instinctive.eu> In-Reply-To: <4FF3D39A.3030800@gmail.com> References: <20120523151357.GC97037@sigil.instinctive.eu> <201207031820.22657.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <20120703231540.I46641@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <201207032128.24837.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <4FF3512E.10908@mehnert.org> <4FF3D39A.3030800@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on Tuesday 03 July 2012 at 22:24, matt wrote: > On 07/03/12 13:08, Hannes Mehnert wrote: > > I believe you've to patch acpi_ibm with the lenovo (LEN0068) identifier > > and recompile - see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/164538 > > > Indeed, however I wouldn't hope for too much. The new EC seems to have > some differences. > While some values appear and work, I'm not sure it will help much. Other > values have appeared corrupted for me, while thankfully not appearing to > crash the ec or cause malfunction. As I wrote elsewhere, I haven't benefited from LEN0068-patched acpi_ibm except for wifi/bluetooth/thinklight switch through sysctl and the few other little things. Is it suppose to do more than that? > LEN0068 is a slightly different beast, it would appear. That leads back to the original question still in the subject: is there anything I can do to help support of LEN0068? Is it different enough to warrant a fork from acpi_ibm? Are there specifications supposed to be available somewhere? Thanks for your help, Natacha Porté
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120704075103.GC31763>