Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:27:58 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?xYF1a2FzeiBXxIVzaWtvd3NraQ==?= <lukasz@wasikowski.net> To: Andrea Brancatelli <abrancatelli@schema31.it>, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BHyVe - ESXi comparison Message-ID: <52E7943E.2080908@wasikowski.net> In-Reply-To: <CADfWLe=zOc2CYRXf8ZuG4uZqN%2BMBck4y1JoDcmrX--JqAgDSQw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADfWLe=zOc2CYRXf8ZuG4uZqN%2BMBck4y1JoDcmrX--JqAgDSQw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
W dniu 2014-01-28 12:18, Andrea Brancatelli pisze: > We did a very rough comparison betweend BHyVe and VMWare ESXi. Maybe you > want to give it a read and let me know if I did write a bunch of sh!t :-) > > http://andrea.brancatelli.it/2014/01/28/freebsd-10-0-bhyve-vmware-esxi-5-5-comparison/ > > I must say I'm very pleased with BHyVe performances! Very good work!! > > Thanks for your time. You've wrote: BHyVe took 332 seconds VMWare took 313 seconds The difference is about 106.7%. I think that the correct conclusion should state: if we assume VMware's time as a reference than BHyVe was 6.7% slower (not 106.7%). And it should be 6,41% really :) -- best regards, Lukasz Wasikowski
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52E7943E.2080908>