Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:34:21 +0100 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Josh Paetzel <friar_josh@tcbug.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docproj port Message-ID: <20031217233414.GA658@arthur.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20031217141537.GB6618@ns1.tcbug.org> References: <20031217141537.GB6618@ns1.tcbug.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003.12.17 14:15:38 +0000, Josh Paetzel wrote: > I noticed that there is now a couple of new docproj ports, one with jadet= ex=20 > and one without...I'm wondering if the fdp should be updated to reflect t= he=20 > new ports, as the old docproj port appears to be depreciated, or at the v= ery=20 > least no longer needed. The two "new" ports docproj-jadetex and docproj-nojadetex are just metaports that set the JADETEX make variable to either "yes" or "no" and then include the docproj port. The docproj port is not depreciated, two to meta ports are just there to make it simpler to install the docproj port. If you think the FDP should tell people about the two "new" ports you chould submit a patch :-). --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/4Of2h9pcDSc1mlERAiIzAJ97ggKWdonGaDCGV53ASb2hUuX+PwCfSwi5 WeNJytE9JZupYLjlaPex8Oc= =Qpk1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031217233414.GA658>